One of the most important conditions that the trainer must meet in
order to ride exercises correctly is strict adherence to the requirements
of the training scale. I have repeatedly stated that fact to emphasize
its importance. As with any good rule there are exceptions, like the
short step away from the correct order of the scale in order to solve
a problem the horse may have. Only experienced trainers should allow
themselves that shortcut knowing that they will return to the rules
of the scale as soon as the problem is solved. The scale demands from
the horse throughness (rhythm, suppleness and connection) as well
as impulsion and straightness for it to further advance in collection.
The scale does not claim that it is the only way, but that it is the
easiest and most natural way. It takes into consideration the horse’s
physical, mental, and emotional make-up and, therefore, it enhances
its chances for a happy, healthy, and long life in spite of hard work
and a life in captivity.
In previous chapters we talked about specific exercises to develop
throughness and impulsion, and now we move to collection beyond just
balancing the horse. It appears as though we have skipped straightness.
Actually we did not since all the schooling we have done up to this
point helped to overcome the horse’s natural crookedness. The
best way to straighten the horse is to work him on bent lines. It
is important, however, that we have the horse properly bent when we
ride these lines. Corners, circles, spirals, serpentines, and shoulder-in,
when ridden correctly, will supple your horse and teach him to accept
the bit equally on both sides. I believe that straightness was made
a part of the scale because this condition needed to be emphasized
so that riders would not proceed with collection before the horse
had been made straight. The Germans call it, “Straightening
bend work.”
Should you find that your horse is through, has the desire to go
forward, and is powerful enough to collect more but still does not
travel straight, go back to schooling him on bent lines and in the
shoulder-in until you feel an even connection in both reins. It is
imperative that your horse step under his center of gravity in order
for him to place his weight a little farther back towards his hindquarters
and still be able to carry and balance it. Some horses evade the heavier
load by becoming crooked again, stepping alongside their body, and
thus weighing the shoulder down. In this case often the demands are
too much for him at this time and the trainer must go back to improve
the strength of the horse. She can accomplish that by returning to
the exercises the horse performed without resorting to evasions. Under
no circumstances should she now try to force the horse into compliance.
He may obey and she may think to have won that battle but the price
will be paid in loss of confidence and desire to be in harmony. This
may then turn out to be the beginning of a downward spiral where a
little force creates the need for more force, etc. The time spent
to strengthen the horse’s hindquarters will pay off in much
faster progress later and in better performances.
The reason I stepped away from just the exercises is that we now
enter into the area where collection becomes the main focus of our
efforts. The shoulder-in is certainly an exercise to improve collection
but it also plays an important role in suppleness, impulsion, and
straightness. Riding a travers, for instance, will also help improve
our horses in all these conditions. It, however, already requires
collection to also be present in the horse to quite a degree in order
to execute this exercise correctly. So, we will now look at the following
exercises strictly with increasing the collection of our horses in
mind.
Unlike at the shoulder-in, in travers, renvers, and half-pass, the
horse looks in the direction it is traveling. In these exercises the
outside legs step around the inside legs, while in the shoulder-in
the inside legs move around the outside legs. Another difference is
that we start schooling the shoulder-in at working gaits while the
other lateral movements require a degree of collection. The reason
is that they demand a stronger bend and the horse is asked to travel
at four tracks rather than the three tracks of the shoulder-in.
To me the best way to introduce the travers to the horse is to ride
a volte in the first corner of the long side to establish the bend,
throughness, and collection sufficient for a travers. At the moment
the shoulder of the horse arrives back at the track, the outside rein
prevents the horse from continuing on the volte and guides it along
the rail. Simultaneously the outside leg behind the girth keeps the
hind legs from moving onto the track and drives to maintain impulsion
and their position inside the track. Once the travers has been established,
the inside rein with the inside leg preserve the bend while the outside
rein assures an even bend throughout the horse by limiting its bend
in the neck. The inside leg at the girth and the outside leg behind
the girth sustain the activity of the horse in its hindquarters. The
rider’s weight helps the horse with its balance by sitting more
to the inside. This interaction of all the aids shows that riding
the lateral movements is not for beginner riders. It takes a great
deal of feel to know what aid is needed and when to apply it to correctly
help the horse. This can only be accomplished from an absolutely independent
seat.
To teach a horse these exercises we must not expect that the horse
will execute them if only we apply the aids correctly. At this point
he does not have a clear understanding of what the trainer wants,
and to move laterally is awkward to him. He will be very hesitant
to follow all the aids and may, therefore, not oblige. This is not
disobedience and the horse should not be punished, but it must be
corrected. The degree of correction depends on the horse’s response
to the aids. This means that the trainer must feel her way to the
least severe but effective correction. That takes a great deal of
sensitivity for the horse’s reaction to her aids. This is also
the point where the trainer must realize that without throughness
in the horse, without the horse’s desire for harmony, and without
the horse’s body sufficiently prepared in strength and flexibility
to be able to execute the exercises, she is stuck.
The best approach to teaching lateral movements to the horse is
to expect progress in small increments. The temptation to want it
all right now is very great but equally great is the number of ways
in which the horse can evade correctness and protect itself from the
physical harm it may inflict upon itself by obeying a command its
body just simply is not ready to execute. Many of the evasions are
very subtle, like a tilt in its head, stiffening of the hind legs,
a change in rhythm, and worst of all a change (often almost imperceptible)
in the beat of the gait. Such a trainer is not only stuck, but has
entered quick sand.
Let us do the math to explain the merits of the small increments
approach to teaching the travers. You decide to just add one inch
per day to the bend of your horse. You measure it by the amount with
which your horse steps into the arena with its hind legs without resorting
to any evasions or showing any kind of resistance or tension. That
would mean that after only thirty riding days your horse has mastered
the travers. That is fast considering all the other benefits that
come along with this accomplishment. The shoulder-in has improved,
the renvers is a gift that only requires little work to be added to
your horse’s knowledge, your horse is prepared to start schooling
the half-pass, he seems to enjoy his work more, his confidence level
is up, etc. Of course this is a rather simplistic explanation. There
will be days where adding even a single inch appears too much, but
the next day he seems willing to try for two. He is still a horse
and not a machine, but with this idea of a little progress every day
your progress will be faster and you will have preserved your horse
for better performances, a longer useful life, and much, much more
fun at your work.
In the travers we want enough bend in the horse that he travels on
four tracks. This increased bend is the additional difficulty for
the horse of the travers vs. the shoulder-in. A further problem for
the rider is that she must rely solely on feel to determine whether
her horse has bent enough to correctly execute the exercise. Mirrors
in the arena or knowledgeable eyes on the ground are helpful in that
case.
As far as the renvers is concerned, the increased difficulty lies
in the start of the exercise, not in the exercise itself. In the shoulder-in
and the travers the rider has the opportunity to prepare the horse
by creating the proper bend in the corner or off a volte. The renvers,
when executed along the rail, requires that the rider must start with
a shoulder-in and then change the bend of the horse while maintaining
the hindquarters at the rail and the shoulder on the second track
inside the arena. It is the change of bend that often proves to be
the source of tension or loss of cadence in the movement. The horse
must have acquired a greater degree of suppleness and throughness
to be able to change its bend seamlessly.
As long as your horse still shows some tension or resistance to the
shoulder-in or the travers, it is not ready to school the renvers.
Spirals and figure of eight will help to accustom a horse to changes
in its bend. Also, shoulder-in to leg-yield and back to shoulder-in
help prepare the horse for the renvers. By first only asking the horse
to vary its spine from bend to straight and back to bend in the same
direction again we have once more reduced the demand and made it easier
for the horse to obey. This obedience allows the trainer to stay in
harmony with her horse and strengthen the horse’s confidence
to give the change of bend from one side to the other a try. The technique
of asking for only a little more every time will prove effective again.
Sometimes when I read my own articles I believe I could have made
it as a preacher. It seems that I have no hesitation about repeating
myself over and over again to make a point. Patience, so it appears,
leads in the list of priorities when it comes to training a horse
according to these articles. This is followed by sober judgment. It
takes courage to be honest in the assessment of one’s own work
up to this point, but it is essential to proceeding in the training.
The answers to three questions must be clear in the mind of the trainer:
First, where is my horse physically, mentally, and does he have a
clear understanding about what he has been taught? Second, what are
my horse’s strengths, weaknesses and limits? Third, where are
my strengths, weaknesses and limits? The last one, of course, takes
the most nerve to face and judge correctly. It is the trainer’s
ability to properly evaluate her current situation with her horse
that will show her how to progress from here successfully.
The half-pass is the logical next step in the horse’s education.
It is a travers along an imagined diagonal line. We ride it across
the width of the arena, half the width of the arena, across the width
of the arena in only half the length of the arena, half the width
of the arena in only half the length of the arena, half the width
of the arena in half the length of the arena and back half the width
of the arena, across the width of the arena in half the length of
the arena and back the width of the arena and the zigzag half-pass.
While training at home we can, of course, use any combination of diagonals
along which to travers and we can combine the half-pass with other
exercises to improve our horses. The aids are the same as in travers.
One of the characteristics of the correctly ridden half-pass is that
the shoulder slightly leads the hindquarter. The most effective way
to guide the horse into the half-pass is, therefore, to ride a step
in shoulder-in before asking for the half-pass. The horse is bent
around the rider’s inside leg and looking in the direction in
which it will travel. Also in the half-pass we must be aware of the
horse’s tendency to lose impulsion when traveling bent lines
or with a bend in its body. Our inside leg, while actively maintaining
the bend in the horse, must also work against the loss of impulsion.
Our outside leg placed behind the girth also must double task in not
only pushing the horse sideways, but also forward.
What causes me a headache in defining the correct execution of the
lateral movements is how to describe the correct bend in the horse
during lateral movements, especially the half-pass. The bend in the
shoulder-in is determined by the tracks of the horse’s feet.
The outside shoulder is arranged in front of the inside hip, the outside
hind leg travels close along the inside hind leg thus establishing
three tracks. The bend must be even from poll to tail. That sounds
real simple. The bend, however, will vary from horse to horse. A horse
with a wide shoulder will need a stronger bend than the narrow shouldered
horse. A longer horse will need less bend than the short horse. The
same horse will show a different degree of bend when collected than
when traveling at a working gate. In all of my research I found that
the only definite answer to the bend is its evenness throughout the
length of the horse. Most warnings about avoiding mistakes were about
too much bend or a bend in the neck only and the loss of impulsion
as a result. It becomes even more unclear in the travers and renvers.
How far from the inside front does the outside hind step to describe
the four tracks?
As you know, when in doubt we bring in the experts to share the blame.
My experts in this case were: The German manual, then Harry Boldt
as competitor and trainer, the view of an international Judge through
Alfred Knopfhart, Egon von Neindorf to champion the classic position,
Hans von Heydebreck represents Dressage of a hundred years ago, and
finally the rules of the FEI. Here are the results. The German manual
speaks of a, “Slight bend around the inside leg of the rider.”
At the half-pass Harry Boldt does not want a bend larger than at the
shoulder-in. Egon von Neindorf also speaks of a slight bend and then
quotes von Heydebreck who wants the bend in the travers such that
the outside hind foot travels on the edge of the first track, in other
words, close to the inside of the inside front leg. The rules and
regulations of the FEI want a slight bend that is even throughout
the horse’s body. How clear is that? Alfred Knopfhart took a
stand. He declared that the bend should be such that the body forms
an angle of about thirty degrees with the rail in travers as well
as in renvers. If we were to measure the angle of a horse moving with
the outside hind stepping on the outside edge of the track of the
front legs (Heydebreck’s and Egon von Neindorf’s position)
we would discover that it is about the same angle. Since we have no
clear description of the bend in the German manual, the FEI rule book,
or by Harry Boldt, other than that four tracks should be visible,
I will accept Alfred Knopfhart’s definition.
The half-pass, although a travers along a diagonal line, changes
the angle a little. All my experts agree that the horse should travel
along that line in such a way that its body is about parallel to the
long side with the shoulder leading a little. Imagine your horse at
a half-pass along a line from F to G with its body parallel to the
long side. This would make it a very small angle and it would require
little bend to create that angle. Now imagine your half-pass goes
from F to E and it is easy to recognize the need for a much greater
angle if we still want our horse’s body parallel to the long
side. In my view a horse cannot stay parallel to the long side and
travel in a half-pass along a diagonal line as steep as going from
F to E. Even if it could manage to bend well enough to look at E while
its body stays parallel to the long side it would now have trouble
not to get tangled up in its front end. The outside front leg has
to reach over the inside front leg to such a degree that the inside
front leg would bump it when bending the knee to lift the foot off
the ground. In case the rider would insist on such a bend the horse
would just straighten in the back and bend in the neck only. It could
also escape the situation by trailing in the hindquarters. The answer
would be to assume a lesser bend, as Harry Boldt states, or to allow
the shoulder to lead in a greater degree. In this case the criterion
for a correct travers along the imagined diagonal is no longer fulfilled.
Since the requirements for the half-pass ask for a body parallel to
the long side, the bend must be less than in the travers to allow
the horse to stay supple and forward in the exercise.
Now that I have described the exercises I must say that they are
easier to ride than to explain and that is why we should watch those
who do it correctly and try to imitate them. This knowledge of the
theory, however, is important to recognize who is correct and worthy
of observing and to understand the purpose of riding the movements.
Again, theory adds meaning to practice, so keep reading.